Morality and professionalism vs Legality – The Hillary Duff question

For those who don’t know, there has been some publicity around a situation where Hillary Duff posted a video to her followers of her confronting a random photographer who was filming a sports event that her child attended.

https://pagesix.com/2020/02/22/hilary-duff-blasts-creepy-photographer-for-taking-pictures-of-her-kids/

Now I don’t want to get into whether he was paparazzi or not. For now I want to assume he isn’t and approach the issue of whether he was wrong or right from a pure photographer perspective.

Lots of people have been quick to defend the photographer from a pure legal perspective and that’s the issue I want to address here. It’s a classic case of “It’s legal, so it’s not the photographers fault.”

This is the part I want to talk about, and approach…

Firstly, there is a big difference between legally, professionally and morally.

Lets talk about what you can legally do in today’s society:

  • You can legally drive to the front of a queue of cars and push in but that doesn’t make it right.
  • You can legally walk up to a fat person eating in McDonald’s and ask them why they are eating junk food when they are fat, but that doesn’t make it right either.
  • From a photography business perspective, you could legally ask a customer on a date but that’s unprofessional. This is one of the reasons why companies have something called a “Code of conduct”. It’s to bridge the gap between legal and acceptable behaviour.

So why is a photographer okay simply because it’s legal? Someone I saw posted an apt response to say that there were a lot of morally reprehensible things in history that were legal and using legal as a benchmark isn’t sound.

Slavery, apartheid and the holocaust were all legal. Killing homosexuals is still legal in some countries. Stoning people for adultery is legal. Whilst this isn’t close to the severity of the actions of the photographer in questions, it shows that the line drawn for legality is not a line that we should aspire to. We should aspire to more than that.

It doesn’t mean go out and break the law, but it means think about your actions, even if they are legal. If people are uncomfortable with what you are doing, stop and think about it from their perspective.

The problem we have is that if photographers don’t curtail their actions, the laws will be changed to curtail them and when that occurs, everyone will get punished.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.
%d bloggers like this: